RELIGIOUS IDENTITY CONFORMITY IN RADICAL ENVIRONMENTS: A REVIEW OF THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION
Keywords:
conformity, religious identity, radicalism, psychology of religionAbstract
Religious-based radicalism is a multidimensional phenomenon that cannot be understood solely through ideological or political perspectives; it also requires an in-depth analysis of individual and group psychological dynamics. One of the key psychological mechanisms involved in the internalization of radical ideology is conformity, defined as an individual’s tendency to adjust beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors to align with group norms. This article aims to revise and expand the discussion on religious identity conformity within radical environments from the perspective of the psychology of religion. Using a qualitative library research method, this study reviews literature from psychology of religion, social psychology, sociology of religion, and contemporary radicalism studies. The findings indicate that religious identity conformity is driven by the need for existential certainty, psychological security, social acceptance, and strong normative group pressures legitimized by religious discourse. From the psychology of religion perspective, radicalism reflects a narrowing of religious meaning that neglects reflective, empathetic, and humanistic dimensions of religion. This article is expected to contribute theoretically to psychology of religion studies and to provide a conceptual foundation for preventive strategies against religious radicalism through the development of moderate, reflective, and inclusive religious identities.References
Allport, G. W. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5(3), 447–457.
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 338–342.
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization. Political Psychology, 35(1), 69–93.
Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2013). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Silberman, I. (2005). Religion as a meaning system: Implications for the new millennium. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 641–663.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Sulastri. (2021). Konformitas keagamaan dan eksklusivisme kelompok dalam perspektif psikologi sosial. Jurnal Psikologi Islam, 8(2), 145–158.
Horgan, J. (2014). The psychology of terrorism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Post, J. M. (2007). The mind of the terrorist: The psychology of terrorism from the IRA to Al-Qaeda. Palgrave Macmillan.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). Radical Islam rising: Muslim extremism in the West. Rowman & Littlefield.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. Psychology Press.
Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340.
Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2018). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (5th ed.). Guilford Press.
